An Analysis of Students’ Error in Using Conditional Sentences Type II at Second Grade of Mas Al-Washliyah Marbau

  • Rizki Lestari Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - Universitas Al Washliyah Labuhanbatu
  • Nurma Dinda Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - Universitas Al Washliyah Labuhanbatu
  • Adinda Wulandari Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - Universitas Al Washliyah Labuhanbatu

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to identify and to classify the error types, to find out the occurrence frequency of each error types and to find out the causes of errors of conditional sentence type II in Second Grade of Natural Science in MAS Al-Washliyah Marbau. The method used in this study is qualitative method. The qualitative design applied in this study was case study. This study is also conducted using error analysis procedures started from data collection, identification of errors, description of errors, and explanation of errors. The researcher used the descriptive analysis method in this research to describe students’ errors and analyzed the data by using formula: P = f x 100%. The data were taken from the test. In this study, the data were collected using observation, test, and interview (both teacher’s and students’ interview). The result is known that the students committed four kinds of errors, i.e.: omission, addition, mis-formation and disordering. From those, the students’ errors are mostly in mis-formation. It took 40%. Moreover, 30% errors fell into omission and 22,5% errors fell into addition; whereas, for disordering, it only took 7,5% errors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azar, Betty Schrampfer. 1992. Fundamentals of English grammar. New Jersey: Prentice hall
Bogdan, Robert C. and Biklen, Sari Knopp. 2007. Qualitative Research for Education: an Introduction to Theories and Methods. Boston: Pearson.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching: Fourth edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc.
Celce-Murcia, M. and D. Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course (2nd Edition). New York: Heinle and Heinle.
Corder, S. P. (1974). Error Analysis. In J. P. B. Allen and S. Pit Corder (eds.) Techniques in Applied Linguistics (The Edinburgh Course in Applied Linguistics: 3), London: Oxford University Press (Language and Language Learning),
Corder, S.P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. Reprinted in J.C. Richards (ed.) (1974, 1984) Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman, (Originally in International Review of Applied Linguistics.
Cowan, R. 2008. The Teacher’s Grammar of English. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dullay, Heidi S. Burt, Marina. Krashen, Stephen. (1982) Language Two, New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, Rod. 2003. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferguson, G. 2000. If you pop over there: A corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 61-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889 4906(99)00027-7
Fleming, J. 2003. Conditional sentences. Online at http://faculty.deanza.edu/flemingjohn/stories/storyReader$18 [accessed 30/06/2016]
Gay, L.R. 1987. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. Ohio: Merill Publishing Company.
James, Carl. (1998). Errors in Language Learning and Use – Exploring Error Analysis. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Maurer, Jay. (2006). Focus on Grammar: An Integrated Skills approach: Third Edition. New York: Pearson Education.
Norris, John. (1983). Language Learners and Their Errors. London: The Macmillan Press. Ltd.
Pardiyono, 2009. Teaching Genre Based Speaking. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Penston ,Tony. 2005. A Concise Grammar for English Language Teachers. Ireland: TP Publication
Published
2017-09-03