Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Through Predict, Organize, Rehearse, Practice and Evaluate (PORPE) Strategy Second Grade Student at SMA Negeri 1 Silangkitang

  • Shopiah Anggraini Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - Universitas Al Washliyah Labuhanbatu
  • Sri Rumala Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - Universitas Al Washliyah Labuhanbatu
  • Sania Fauziah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - Universitas Al Washliyah Labuhanbatu

Abstract

This study is aimed at finding out the impacts of the use of PORPE strategy in improving the reading comprehension among eight grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Silangkitang. The subject of this research was eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Silangkitang. It consisted of one class with 30 students as respondents. This research was conducted by using classroom action research. The technique of analyzing data was applied in this research were qualitative and quantitative. The qualitative data were taken from observation sheet, interview, and documentation. The quantitative data were taken from tests. The tests were given to the students in the form of pre-test, post-test I and post-test II. The result of data analysis showed that there was an improvement on the students’ improvement in reading comprehension from each cycle. It was showed from the mean of pre-test which was 42,5, after PORPE Strategy was applied in the first cycle, there was an improvement of the result of the students’ mean which was 66,8 and for the second cycle after reflection on the first cycle there was an improvement of students’ mean which was 76,76. Moreover In the pre-test, there were 13,33 % (4 of 30 students) who got score ≥ 68. In the post-test I, there were 43.33%% (13 of 30 students) who got score ≥ 68. In the post-test II, there were 90% (25 of 30 students) who got score ≥ 68. Therefore, the total percentage of the improvement from the pre-test to post-test II was about 90%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ary, Donald. 1979. Introduction to research in Education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. 1984. Metacognitive skills and reading. In P.D.
Pearson(Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
Best, J. W. & Khan, J. V. 2002. Research in Education 7th. New Delhi: Prentice Hall.
Brown, H. D. 2004. Language Assessment: Principle and Classroom Practice. New York: Pearson Education.
Burns, Anne. 2003. Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chatman, S., and B. Attebery. Reading Narrative Fiction. New York: McMillan,1993.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2006. Syllabus KTSP untuk SMA. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Freeman, Diana Larsen. 2013. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2010. How to Teach English, New Edition. New York:Pearson Education.
Lee, J., Grigg, W.S., & Donahue, P. L. (2007). The Nation’s Report card: Reading 2007 http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main/2007//. (Accessed on, October, 2016)
Simpson, M. L., Hayes, C.G. 1988. An Initial Validation of a Study Strategy System. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 20, 149-180 Available at:http://jlr.sagepub.com(Accessed on June 2012
Vincent Grenary. 2009. Education in Indonesia from crisis to recovery. Available at: http://www.libraryforall.blogspot.com (Accessed on, October, 2016)
Published
2018-03-03
Section
Articles